Что думаешь? Оцени!
近期，投资研究机构 Citrini Research 发布题为《2028 年全球智能危机》的推演报告，预测 AI Agent（智能体）的大规模普及将引发白领失业潮并导致全球经济结构性崩盘。，这一点在搜狗输入法2026中也有详细论述
2月25日下午，国家主席习近平在北京钓鱼台国宾馆会见来华进行正式访问的德国总理默茨。，推荐阅读搜狗输入法下载获取更多信息
The real annoying thing about Opus 4.6/Codex 5.3 is that it’s impossible to publicly say “Opus 4.5 (and the models that came after it) are an order of magnitude better than coding LLMs released just months before it” without sounding like an AI hype booster clickbaiting, but it’s the counterintuitive truth to my personal frustration. I have been trying to break this damn model by giving it complex tasks that would take me months to do by myself despite my coding pedigree but Opus and Codex keep doing them correctly. On Hacker News I was accused of said clickbaiting when making a similar statement with accusations of “I haven’t had success with Opus 4.5 so you must be lying.” The remedy to this skepticism is to provide more evidence in addition to greater checks and balances, but what can you do if people refuse to believe your evidence?